Adds restrictions on compelled diversity statements, certain public education offices and programs, and race-based discipline, subject to exceptions.
Proposition 142 · Arizona · Nov 3, 2026
Public-sector preferences and DEI
Would expand constitutional restrictions on public-sector preferences, discrimination, and specified diversity practices.
At a glance
Constitutional amendment- Does it raise taxes?
- No new tax.
- Estimated cost or revenue
- Not yet verified
- Who pays
- Not yet verified
- Where the money goes
- Not yet verified
- How long
- Not yet verified
Worth knowing: No quantified fiscal analysis verified.
From the Arizona Secretary of State and the state’s fiscal analysis. Estimates are the state’s, not ours.
Your choice
Saved privately on this device.What your vote does
Retains the existing constitutional restrictions.
Existing federal protections remain applicable.
How the money works
TypeConstitutional amendment
A bond is a loan.
Check the official analysis for how it’s repaid.
Cost, who pays and where the money goes are in “At a glance” above.
What your guides say
No guides selected yet. Pick guides to compare.
Why they disagree
Supporters say the law should be colorblind and that current law doesn’t create a level playing field.
Supporters (summary)Opponents say current law already bans discrimination, and that the measure’s broad wording could restrict teaching, research and data about race.
Opponents (summary)Who’s funding it
We haven’t loaded campaign-finance filings for Proposition 142 yet. You can look them up directly:
Sources
- Arizona Legislative Council
Official analysis: Proposition 142 · ballot-facts
Checked Oct 31, 2026 - Arizona Secretary of State
2026 election source · ballot-facts
Checked Oct 31, 2026