Bars systems without a qualifying contract by December 31, 2026; local existing systems need voter approval at the next general election and each ten years afterward.
Proposition 319 · Arizona · Nov 3, 2026
Traffic camera restrictions
Would prohibit new traffic photo-enforcement systems and require local votes to continue existing systems.
At a glance
Constitutional amendment- Does it raise taxes?
- No new tax. Restricts traffic cameras, which may reduce ticket revenue.
- Estimated cost or revenue
- Not yet verified
- Who pays
- No new tax or dedicated payer established.
- Where the money goes
- Traffic enforcement.
- How long
- Existing local systems require approval every ten years.
Worth knowing: Fine-revenue and operating-cost effects not quantified in reviewed analysis.
From the Arizona Secretary of State and the state’s fiscal analysis. Estimates are the state’s, not ours.
Your choice
Saved privately on this device.What your vote does
Retains existing photo-enforcement law.
Applies to speeding and traffic-control violations; it is not a general ban on surveillance cameras.
How the money works
TypeConstitutional amendment
Cost, who pays and where the money goes are in “At a glance” above.
What your guides say
No guides selected yet. Pick guides to compare.
Why they disagree
Supporters say traffic cameras invade privacy and automated tickets shouldn’t replace officers.
Supporters (summary)Opponents say cameras are a proven safety tool that reduces deadly crashes, and the ban sweeps in red-light cameras along with speed cameras.
Opponents (summary)Who’s funding it
We haven’t loaded campaign-finance filings for Proposition 319 yet. You can look them up directly:
Sources
- Arizona Legislative Council
Official analysis: Proposition 319 · ballot-facts
Checked Oct 31, 2026 - Arizona Secretary of State
2026 election source · ballot-facts
Checked Oct 31, 2026