← Your ballot
Proposal 2 · New York City · Nov 3, 2026

City contracting

Official title: Reduce City Contractor Paperwork: Require Regular Meetings of Procurement Policy Board

Changes vendor questionnaires, contracting approvals and Procurement Policy Board meetings.

At a glance

Charter amendment
Does it raise taxes?
No. Changes city contracting procedures.
Estimated cost or revenue
Not quantified in the cited official explanation.
Who pays
City government; specific incidence not quantified.
Where the money goes
City administration
How long
Charter amendment; no sunset identified.

Worth knowing: No independently verified dollar estimate in this dataset.

From the NYC Votes and the state’s fiscal analysis. Estimates are the state’s, not ours.

Your choice

Saved privately on this device.

What your vote does

✓ A Yes vote means

Lets the board tailor questionnaires, requires quarterly meetings and permits additional delegated approvals.

× A No vote means

Keeps existing questionnaire authority and approval rules.

Stays the same either way

What remains the same under either outcome has not been independently established in this research.

How the money works

TypeCharter amendment
Rate or thresholdNot a tax-rate measure.

Cost, who pays and where the money goes are in “At a glance” above.

What your guides say

No guides selected yet. Pick guides to compare.

Why they disagree

Supporters say

Good-government groups including Common Cause, Citizens Union and Reinvent Albany say simpler paperwork and regular board meetings would speed up contracts that delay nonprofits and small businesses.

Supporters (summary)
Opponents say

Some nonprofits and city officials support the goal but doubt these changes will actually make contracting easier.

Skeptics (summary)

Who’s funding it

We haven’t loaded campaign-finance filings for Proposal 2 yet. You can look them up directly:

Sources

  • NYC Votes

    2026 Ballot Proposal 2 · Official plain-language explanation

    Checked Oct 31, 2026